Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-548 Confidential ADVICE OF COUNSEL July 2, 2013 13-548 This responds to your letter of May 6, 2013, by which you requested a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon a township supervisor who, in a private capacity, is part owner of a corporation that provides [type of services], with regard to participating/voting as to contracts, bills, or other matters involving business(es) to which the corporation provides services that are unrelated to township projects. Facts: You request a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission based upon submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. You are a Supervisor for [name of township] (the “Township”), located in [name of county] (the “County”), Pennsylvania. Over the course of the last several years, the Township has contracted with a company named [name of company] (“Company 1”) for the use and rental of A and B for public projects. During the same time period, the Township has also contracted with a company named [name of company] (“Company 2”) for C used in D. In a private capacity, you hold a [percentage] ownership interest in a corporation named [name of corporation] (the “Corporation”). The Corporation provides [type of services] throughout the County. You state that Company 1, Company 2, and other businesses have contracted with the Corporation for the Corporation to E and that none of the work performed by the Corporation has been for or related to the Township contracts awarded to Company 1 and Company 2. You state that the Township may be presented with possible contracts with and/or bills from Company 1, Company 2, and other businesses in the future. Based upon the above submitted facts, the question that is presented is whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon you with regard to participating/voting as to contracts, bills, or other matters involving business(es) to which the Corporation provides services that are unrelated to Township projects. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester Confidential Advice, 13-548 July 2, 2013 Page 2 based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As a Township Supervisor, you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted activities (a)Conflict of interest.-- No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j)Voting conflict.-- Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three-member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j). The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or Confidential Advice, 13-548 July 2, 2013 Page 3 other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self-employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. "Financial interest." Any financial interest in a legal entity engaged in business for profit which comprises more than 5% of the equity of the business or more than 5% of the assets of the economic interest in indebtedness. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office/employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act does not prohibit public officials/public employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public official/public employee may not use the authority of his public position--or confidential information obtained by being in that position--for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89-011. Examples of conduct that would be prohibited under Section 1103(a) would include: (1) the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action, Metrick, Order 1037; (2) the use of governmental facilities, such as governmental telephones, postage, equipment, research materials, or other property, or the use of governmental personnel, to conduct private business activities, Freind, Order 800; Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public official/public employee is associated in his private capacity or private client(s). Miller, Opinion 89-024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92-010. Per State Ethics Commission precedent, a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act may be based upon an ongoing business relationship (Kitner, Order 1542; Burchfield, Order 1492; Johnson, Order 1338; Confidential Opinion, 06- 001; Kannebecker, supra; Miller, supra), or a reasonable and legitimate expectation that a business relationship will form (Gerhard, Order 1460; Mann, Opinion 07-005; Moore, Opinion 04-004; Confidential Opinion, 00-006; Amato, Opinion 89-002). Confidential Advice, 13-548 July 2, 2013 Page 4 The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that in order to violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee “must be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for himself, his family, or his business, and then must take action in the form of one or more specific steps to attain that benefit.” Kistler v. State Ethics Commission, 610 Pa. 516, 528, 22 A.3d 223, 231 (2011). In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public official/public employee would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(b), (c), provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official/public employee anything of monetary value and no public official/public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official/public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Having set forth the above principles, you are advised as follows. The Corporation is a business with which you are associated in your capacity as an owner. You would have a conflict of interest and would transgress Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act by participating in your official capacity as to contracts, bills, or other matters involving Company 1, Company 2, or other business(es) to which the Corporation provides services or has a reasonable expectation of providing services, to the extent that: (1) you would be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for yourself, a member of your immediate family, or a business with which you or a member of your immediate family is associated; and (2) your action would constitute one or more specific steps to attain that benefit (Kistler, supra). As noted above, in each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Second Class Township Code. Conclusion: As a Supervisor for [name of Township] (the “Township”), located in [name of county] (the “County”), Pennsylvania, you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) over the course of the last several years, the Township has contracted with a company named [name of company] (“Company 1”) for the use and rental of A and B for public projects; (2) during the same time period, the Township has also contracted with a company named [name of company] (“Company 2”) for C used in D; (3) in a private capacity, you hold a [percentage] ownership interest in a corporation named [name of corporation] (the “Corporation”); (4) the Corporation provides [type of services] throughout the County; (5) Company 1, Company 2, and other businesses have contracted with the Corporation for the Corporation to E; (6) none of the work performed by the Corporation has been Confidential Advice, 13-548 July 2, 2013 Page 5 for or related to the Township contracts awarded to Company 1 and Company 2; and (7) the Township may be presented with possible contracts with and/or bills from Company 1, Company 2, and other businesses in the future, you are advised as follows. The Corporation is a business with which you are associated in your capacity as an owner. You would have a conflict of interest and would transgress Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act by participating in your official capacity as to contracts, bills, or other matters involving Company 1, Company 2, or other business(es) to which the Corporation provides services or has a reasonable expectation of providing services, to the extent that: (1) you would be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for yourself, a member of your immediate family, or a business with which you or a member of your immediate family is associated; and (2) your action would constitute one or more specific steps to attain that benefit. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel