Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-575 Previte ADVICE OF COUNSEL November 15, 2012 Jason M. Previte 4046 Burtner Road Natrona Heights, PA 15065 12-575 Dear Mr. Previte: This responds to your letter of September 25, 2012, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any restrictions upon employment of a Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor – Transportation following termination of employment with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”). Facts: You request an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission regarding the post-employment restrictions of the Ethics Act. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. You are employed as a Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor – Transportation with PennDOT in the Bridgeville Office of Engineering District 11-0 (“District 11-0”), in which capacity you serve as the Regional Traffic Management Center (“RTMC”) Manager. You have submitted copies of your official PennDOT position description and an organizational chart for District 11-0, both of which documents are incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the job classification specifications for the position of Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor – Transportation (job code 1114T) has been obtained and is also incorporated herein by reference. In your capacity as a Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor - Transportation, you directly supervise the “24/7 Operations” of the RTMC and oversee all design, construction and maintenance of PennDOT’s Intelligent Transportation System (“ITS”) within District 11-0. You are also a participant in several committees or groups initiated by PennDOT’s Central Office for advancement of the ITS program. You state that in the past year and a half, you participated in a selection committee that selected a proposal for PennDOT’s Advanced Transportation Management Software system. You state that the aforesaid contract was awarded to Open Roads Consulting in August 2012. You further state that you did not participate in any other selection committees in the past three years. You state that you plan to leave PennDOT in the near future and that you are considering seeking employment with a private engineering consulting firm that does business with PennDOT. Previte, 12-575 November 15, 2012 Page 2 You seek guidance as to what activities following termination of your Commonwealth employment would constitute prohibited “representation” under Section 1103(g) of the Ethic Act, as well as answers to the following questions: (1) Whether, as an ITS Division Manager for a consulting company providing engineering services to PennDOT, you would be permitted to perform routine engineering assignments such as Traffic Engineering and ITS design/integration on PennDOT projects; (2) Whether the appearance of your name on a payroll or other formal submission to PennDOT would constitute prohibited “representation” under Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act; and (3) Whether District 11-0 would be considered the “unit” of PennDOT in which you work and whether your name could appear on routine invoices for pre- existing contracts that your prospective new employer may have with PennDOT outside of District 11-0. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As a Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor - Transportation for PennDOT, you would be considered a “public employee” subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1; Reese/Gilliland, Opinion 05-005; McClellan, Advice 10-550; Webster, Advice 08-579. This conclusion is based upon the position description and the job classification specifications, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicate clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official action of a non-ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the following: contracting; procurement; administering or monitoring grants or subsidies; planning or zoning; inspecting; licensing; regulating; auditing; or other activity(ies) where the economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person. Consequently, upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official/public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official/public employee with regard to “representing” a “person” before “the governmental body with which he has been associated”: § 1103. Restricted activities (g) Former official or employee.-- No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added). Previte, 12-575 November 15, 2012 Page 3 The terms “represent,” “person,” and "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The term "Person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other businesses. It also includes the former public official/public employee himself, Confidential Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007. The term "represent" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89-005. Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official/ public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012. However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95-011. A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former public official/public employee may also counsel any Previte, 12-575 November 15, 2012 Page 4 person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for, the new employer. Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the “governmental body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated” is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R. The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been associated upon termination of your employment with PennDOT would be PennDOT in its entirety, including but not limited to District 11-0. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict “representation” of a “person” before PennDOT. Having set forth the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, your specific questions shall now be addressed. With regard to your first question, you are advised that during the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from performing routine engineering assignments such as Traffic Engineering and ITS design/integration on projects your new employer would be working on for PennDOT, unless you would be able to do so without engaging in prohibited representation before PennDOT as set forth above. In response to your second question, you are advised that the inclusion of your name on documents submitted to or reviewed by PennDOT would constitute prohibited representation before PennDOT as delineated above. With regard to your third question, you are advised as follows. During the one- year period of applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, as a general rule, your name could not be listed on invoices submitted to PennDOT by your new employer. However, if you would perform work for your new employer on PennDOT contracts that existed before you terminated your employment with PennDOT, and if such contracts would not involve the “unit” of PennDOT where you worked, specifically District 11-0, your name could appear on routine invoices submitted to PennDOT as to those particular pre-existing contracts if required by the regulations of PennDOT. See, Abrams/Webster, supra. However, the foregoing is limited to the submission of billing hours. The ability to include your name on invoices subject to the aforesaid conditions would not impact the applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act as to other activities. Based upon the facts that have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the applicability of Section 1103(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no use of authority of office or employment, or confidential information received by being in the public position, for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official/public employee and no public official/public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value Previte, 12-575 November 15, 2012 Page 5 based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official/public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to your inquiry. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor’s Code of Conduct. Conclusion: As a Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor - Transportation for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”), you would be considered a "public employee" subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa. Code § 11.1 et seq. Upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The former governmental body would be PennDOT in its entirety, including but not limited to Engineering District 11-0. For the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict “representation” of a “person” before PennDOT. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel