Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-563 Wagner ADVICE OF COUNSEL November 9, 2011 Robert Wagner 26 Main Street Gilberton, PA 17934 11-563 Dear Mr. Wagner: This responds to your letter dated October 6, 2011, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon a borough council member, who is a plaintiff in a civil rights lawsuit against the borough and the borough mayor and borough police chief in their individual capacities, with regard to the performance of the duties of his borough position as a result of such litigation. Facts: You request an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission based upon submitted facts, the material portion of which may be fairly summarized as follows. You are a Member of Council for Gilberton Borough (“Borough”). On October 6, 2011, you filed a civil rights lawsuit (“Litigation”) against the Borough and the Borough Mayor and Borough Police Chief in their individual capacities. The Litigation seeks declaratory and compensatory relief and punitive damages. Based upon the above submitted facts, you seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon you with regard to performing the duties of your position as a Borough Council Member as a result of the Litigation. You state that you would refrain from participating in any discussion or vote about the Litigation, whether settlement would be appropriate, or the amount of any such settlement. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. Wagner, 11-563 November 9, 2011 Page 2 As a Borough Council Member, you are a public official as that term is defined in the Ethics Act, and therefore you are subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted activities (a)Conflict of interest.-- No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j)Voting conflict.-- Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three-member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j). The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Wagner, 11-563 November 9, 2011 Page 3 "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to your inquiry, you are advised that in order to violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee “must be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for himself, his family, or his business, and then must take action in the form of one or more specific steps to attain that benefit.” Kistler v. State Ethics Commission, Pa. , , 22 A.3d 223, 231 (2011). Although this advisory cannot predict every matter that might present a conflict of interest for you, you are advised that generally, matters pertaining to or affecting the Litigation or a party to the Litigation would present a conflict of interest for you as a public official. See, DeLano, Opinion 88-008; Golla, Opinion 88-004; cf., Nietupski, Advice 10-606; Smith, Advice 09-500; McCullough, Advice 07-534; Oswalt, Advice 07-524; Hiscott, Advices 06-517 and 06-517-S. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed in the event of a voting conflict. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Borough Code. Conclusion: As a Member of Council for Gilberton Borough (“Borough”), you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) on October 6, 2011, you filed a civil rights lawsuit (“Litigation”) against the Borough and the Borough Mayor and Borough Police Chief in their individual capacities; and (2) the Litigation seeks declaratory and compensatory relief and punitive damages, you are advised as follows. In order to violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee “must be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for himself, his family, or his business, and then must take action in the form of one or more specific steps to attain that benefit.” Kistler v. State Ethics Commission, Pa. , , 22 A.3d 223, 231 (2011). Although this advisory cannot predict every matter that might present a conflict of interest for you, you are advised that generally, matters pertaining to or affecting the Litigation or a party to the Litigation would present a conflict of interest for you as a public official. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed in the event of a voting conflict. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such . Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Wagner, 11-563 November 9, 2011 Page 4 Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel