Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-546 Pandeladis ADVICE OF COUNSEL August 25, 2011 Leo Pandeladis, Chief Counsel Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Dixon University Center 2986 North Second Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1201 11-546 Dear Mr. Pandeladis: This responds to your letters dated July 18, 2011, and July 26, 2011, as supplemented and revised by your two letters dated July 27, 2011, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon a president of a university within the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education with regard to the hiring of his spouse for the position of faculty member at the same university where he serves as president. Facts: As Chief Counsel for the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (“PASSHE”), you have been authorized by majority action of the Executive Committee of the Board of Governors of the PASSHE to request an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. Universities within the PASSHE hire faculty pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement (“Collective Bargaining Agreement”) with the Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties. Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement governs the appointment of faculty for the PASSHE universities. You have submitted a copy of Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which document is incorporated herein by reference. Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Article 11 APPOINTMENT OF FACULTY A. 1. In the event the President approves the filling of a vacancy within a department, a candidate, who Pandeladis, 11-546 August 25, 2011 Page 2 may be secured from any source, first must be recommended by the majority of the regular full-time department FACULTY in accordance with the procedure developed by that department FACULTY…. 4. If a candidate is not recommended by the department FACULTY, he/she shall not be hired. If a candidate is recommended to the department by management and is rejected by the department, the reasons therefore shall be given in writing to the President or his/her designee within twenty-one (21) calendar days of such rejection. If the department fails to provide the specific reasons for the rejection of the candidate recommended by management within the twenty-one (21) calendar days, the President may appoint the candidate. B. The recommendation of the department FACULTY in accordance with the provisions of Section A. above then must be reviewed by the department chairperson…. C. After review by the department chairperson, the name of a candidate(s) recommended by the majority of regular full-time department FACULTY, irrespective of the recommendation of the department chairperson, shall be submitted to the President or his/her designee, together with the recommendations both of the majority of regular full-time department FACULTY and of the department chairperson. The President or his/her designee may accept or reject the recommendation of the department FACULTY, including the recommendation of the department chairperson, and that decision shall be final; provided, however, that if the recommendation is rejected, the reasons therefore shall be given to the department FACULTY, if requested; and provided further, that in the event of any such rejection, the procedure specified above shall be repeated until a candidate shall have been appointed to fill the vacancy. D. If the President agrees with the majority of the regular full-time department FACULTY’S recommendation as to a candidate, he/she shall make the appointment of that candidate to such rank and at such salary as he/she shall deem appropriate. E. In the event there is no agreement between the President and the majority of the regular full-time department FACULTY as to a mutually acceptable candidate for appointment to fill the approved vacancy, the President shall have the right to appoint a person to fill the vacancy on an interim basis for a period not to exceed nine (9) months or one (1) academic year, unless a longer period is mutually agreed upon. In no case may the President appoint a person more than once under the provisions of this subsection. …. Collective Bargaining Agreement, Article 11. Pandeladis, 11-546 August 25, 2011 Page 3 A vacancy for an adjunct faculty position (“Faculty Position”) at a university (“University”) within the PASSHE was posted. The posting for the Faculty Position listed required qualifications and skills necessary for applicants to be considered for such position. Applicants for the Faculty Position had to submit their materials to the Chair of the Department. You state that Department review of such applicants and their materials in accordance with the provisions of Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement began immediately. You further state that the Faculty Position will be awarded to the successful candidate in accordance with Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Based upon the above submitted facts, you seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon the President of the University with regard to the hiring of his spouse as a member of the University faculty. You state that the conduct for which you are requesting guidance has not occurred, and that the President of the University has not yet been included in the hiring process for the Faculty Position and has not taken an action related to this matter. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. The President of the University, hereinafter also referred to as “President,” is a public official/public employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Richardson, Opinion 93-006; Richardson, Opinion 89-017; Kelchner, Advice 00-558. Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted activities (a)Conflict of interest.-- No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j)Voting conflict.-- Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three-member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has Pandeladis, 11-546 August 25, 2011 Page 4 abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j). The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother or sister. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office/employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809. In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public official/public employee would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to contracting, provides as follows: Pandeladis, 11-546 August 25, 2011 Page 5 § 1103. Restricted activities (f)Contract.-- No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f). The term “contract” is defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real property. The term shall not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political subdivision as one party and a public official or public employee as the other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary, wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in consideration of his current public employment with the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official/public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an “open and public process” be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official/public employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised as follows. The President’s spouse is a member of his “immediate family” as that term is defined by the Ethics Act. The President generally would have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act in matters that would financially impact him, a member of Pandeladis, 11-546 August 25, 2011 Page 6 his immediate family such as his spouse, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. In each instance of a conflict of interest, the President would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. Turning to your specific inquiry, you are advised as follows. Per Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, the authority of the office of President of the University includes the authority to appoint member(s) of the University faculty and set the rank and salary of such position(s). Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would prohibit the President from hiring his spouse for the position of member of the University faculty and/or setting her rank and salary, because such action(s) would constitute use(s) of authority of his public position for the private pecuniary benefit of a member of his immediate family. See, Yatron, Opinion 02-008; Confidential Opinion, 02- 004; Holvey, Orders 1039, 1039-2. The submitted facts do not indicate whether there is a pre-existing mechanism in place for delegation of the President’s authority in the event of a conflict of interest. You are advised that if there is no pre-existing conflict mechanism in place specifying how and by whom the President’s authority should be exercised in the event of a conflict of interest, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would prohibit the President from delegating to a subordinate the authority that he has as President with respect to the appointment of his spouse to the position of member of the University faculty. Finally, the restrictions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act must be observed when applicable. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) universities within the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (“PASSHE”) hire faculty pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement (“Collective Bargaining Agreement”) with the Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties; (2) a vacancy for an adjunct faculty position (“Faculty Position”) at a university (“University”) within the PASSHE was posted; (3) the posting for the Faculty Position listed required qualifications and skills necessary for applicants to be considered for such position; (4) applicants for the Faculty Position had to submit their materials to the Chair of the Department; (5) Department review of such applicants and their materials in accordance with the provisions of Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement began immediately; and (6) the Faculty Position will be awarded to the successful candidate in accordance with Article 11 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, you are advised as follows. The President of the University (“President”) is a public official/public employee subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. The President’s spouse is a member of his “immediate family” as that term is defined by the Ethics Act. The President generally would have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act in matters that would financially impact him, a member of his immediate family such as his spouse, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. In each instance of a conflict of interest, the President would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would Pandeladis, 11-546 August 25, 2011 Page 7 be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would prohibit the President from hiring his spouse for the position of member of the University faculty and/or setting her rank and salary, because such action(s) would constitute use(s) of authority of his public position for the private pecuniary benefit of a member of his immediate family. The submitted facts do not indicate whether there is a pre-existing mechanism in place for delegation of the President’s authority in the event of a conflict of interest. If there is no pre-existing conflict mechanism in place specifying how and by whom the President’s authority should be exercised in the event of a conflict of interest, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would prohibit the President from delegating to a subordinate the authority that he has as President with respect to the appointment of his spouse to the position of member of the University faculty. The restrictions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act must be observed when applicable. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such . Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel