Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-500 Hendrickson ADVICE OF COUNSEL January 6, 2011 Nicole Stettler Hendrickson rd 937 N. Third Street, 3 Floor Harrisburg, PA 17102 11-500 Dear Ms. Stettler: This responds to your letter dated November 30, 2010 (postmarked December 8, 2010), by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether, in your former capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 with the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs, you would be considered a “public employee” and an “executive-level State employee” subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., such that the post-employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) and Section 1103(i) of the Ethics Act, respectively, would now be applicable to you. Facts: You have requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission based upon submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. You were employed with the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs (hereinafter also referred to as “the Office of Legislative Affairs”) from September 2008 until October 31, 2010, when you terminated your Commonwealth employment. You state that from January 2010 until October 31, 2010, you were employed with the Office of Legislative Affairs as an Administrative Officer 1, with a working title of “Legislative Manager.” You state that as an Administrative Officer 1, you engaged in the following activities: monitoring legislation, coordinating the Office of the Governor’s positions on bills, and communicating the finalized positions to the appropriate offices; managing office interns; overseeing public bill signings by Governor Edward G. Rendell; acting, with supervision, as the Office of Legislative Affairs’ point of contact for legislative offices in smaller agencies; communicating with the legislative offices of various agencies as to the Office of Legislative Affairs’ agenda, reports, and bill positions; working to resolve legislative grant problems on an as-needed basis; and organizing the legislative operations of Governor Rendell’s annual budget address and Special Session address on transportation funding. Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 2 You state that your overall decision-making impact was limited to the responsibilities typical of an Administrative Officer 1 and was entirely contained within the Office of Legislative Affairs. You state that you did not make or have the authority to make policy decisions for any agencies and that the majority of your activities required approval from the Secretary of Legislative Affairs. You assert that you were not responsible for taking or recommending official action of a nonministerial nature that would bring you within the definition of the term “public employee” as set forth in the Ethics Act. A copy of the job classification specifications for the position of Administrative Officer 1 (job code 08630) has been obtained and is incorporated herein by reference. It is noted that you have submitted a copy of a document entitled “Administrative Officer 1,” which document sets forth job duties and responsibilities identical to those contained within the job classification specifications under job code 08630. Per the job classification specifications under job code 08630, the work of an Administrative Officer 1 involves analyzing administrative operations and policies and procedures and preparing and implementing recommendations on procedural, budget, and personnel actions. The duties and responsibilities of an Administrative Officer 1 include: ? Studying and analyzing administrative operations and problems, preparing detailed and comprehensive reports of findings and recommendations, and assisting in implementing procedural or policy changes; ? Performing public contact work in gathering information, resolving complaints, engendering support, and providing information; ? Serving as administrative officer of a state board or commission responsible for functions of moderate complexity and scope; ? Supervising a staff of technical or clerical employees engaged primarily in a single activity; ? Assisting a high level professional or administrative official in the management of agency programs; ? Preparing recommendations and justifications for changes in policies and procedures, budget requests, personnel actions, and management and office services activities; ? Preparing budget estimates and other fiscal and statistical reports and monitoring budget expenditures; ? Insuring adherence to administrative standards through maintenance of control systems; ? Reviewing correspondence, news sources, technical literature, and departmental activities and informing superior of significant developments and problems; and ? Collecting, interpreting, analyzing, and summarizing information to be used as a basis for executive action. Job classification specifications, at 1-2. On November 1, 2010, you gained employment with Delta Development Group, Inc. (“Delta”) as an associate. You state that as your role with Delta expands, Delta may wish for you to be involved in discussions with the administration of the new Governor and the General Assembly. Based upon the above submitted facts, you seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose any restrictions upon you in your new position with Delta. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 3 based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. In responding to your inquiry, the threshold question to be addressed is whether, in your former capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 with the Office of Legislative Affairs under job code 08630, you would be considered an “executive-level State employee” or a “public employee” subject to the Ethics Act. The term "executive-level State employee" is defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Executive-level State employee." The Governor, Lieutenant Governor, cabinet members, deputy secretaries, the Governor’s office staff, any State employee with discretionary powers which may affect the outcome of a State agency’s decision in relation to a private corporation or business or any employee who by virtue of his job function could influence the outcome of such a decision. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The Ethics Act defines the term “public employee” as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Public employee." Any individual employed by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision who is responsible for taking or recommending official action of a nonministerial nature with regard to: (1) contracting or procurement; (2) administering or monitoring grants or subsidies; (3) planning or zoning; (4) inspecting, licensing, regulating or auditing any person; or (5) any other activity where the official action has an economic impact of greater than a de minimis nature on the interests of any person. The term shall not include individuals who are employed by this Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof in teaching as distinguished from administrative duties. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The Regulations of the State Ethics Commission similarly define the term “public employee” and set forth the following additional criteria: Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 4 (ii) The following criteria will be used, in part, to determine whether an individual is within the definition of "public employe": (A) The individual normally performs his responsibility in the field without onsite supervision. (B) The individual is the immediate supervisor of a person who normally performs his responsibility in the field without onsite supervision. (C) The individual is the supervisor of a highest level field office. (D) The individual has the authority to make final decisions. (E) The individual has the authority to forward or stop recommendations from being sent to the person or body with the authority to make final decisions. (F) The individual prepares or supervises the preparation of final recommendations. (G) The individual makes final technical recommen- dations. (H) The individual's recommendations or actions are an inherent and recurring part of his position. (I) The individual's recommendations or actions affect organizations other than his own organization. (iii) The term does not include individuals who are employed by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of the Commonwealth in teaching as distinguished from administrative duties. (iv) Persons in the following positions are generally considered public employes: (A) Executive and special directors or assistants reporting directly to the agency head or governing body. (B) Commonwealth bureau directors, division chiefs or heads of equivalent organization elements and other governmental body department heads. (C) Staff attorneys engaged in representing the department, agency or other governmental bodies. (D) Engineers, managers and secretary-treasurers acting as managers, police chiefs, chief clerks, chief purchasing agents, grant and contract managers, administrative officers, housing and building inspectors, investigators, auditors, sewer enforcement officers and zoning officers in all governmental bodies. Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 5 (E) Court administrators, assistants for fiscal affairs and deputies for the minor judiciary. (F) School superintendents, assistant superintendents, school business managers and principals. (G) Persons who report directly to heads of executive, legislative and independent agencies, boards and commissions except clerical personnel. (v) Persons in the following positions are generally not considered public employes: (A) City clerks, other clerical staff, road masters, secretaries, police officers, maintenance workers, construction workers, equipment operators and recreation directors. (B) Law clerks, court criers, court reporters, probation officers, security guards and writ servers. (C) School teachers and clerks of the schools. 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. Status as a "public employee" subject to the Ethics Act is determined by an objective test. The objective test applies the Ethics Act’s definition of the term “public employee” and the related regulatory criteria to the powers and duties of the position itself. Typically, the powers and duties of the position are established by objective sources that define the position, such as the job description, job classification specifications, and organizational chart. The objective test considers what an individual has the authority to do in a given position based upon these objective sources, rather than the variable functions that the individual may actually perform in the position. See, Phillips v. State Ethics Commission, 470 A.2d 659 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984); Eiben, Opinion 04-002;Shienvold, Opinion 04-001; Shearer, Opinion 03-011. The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has specifically considered and approved the Commission’s objective test and has directed that coverage under the Ethics Act be construed broadly and that exclusions under the Ethics Act be construed narrowly. See, Phillips, supra. The first portion of the statutory definition of “public employee” includes individuals with authority to take or recommend official action of a nonministerial nature. 65 Pa.C.S . § 1102. Likewise, the regulatory criteria for determining status as a public employee, as set forth in 51 Pa. Code § 11.1(“public employee”)(ii), include not only individuals with authority to make final decisions but also individuals with authority to forward or stop recommendations from being sent to final decision-makers; individuals who prepare or supervise the preparation of final recommendations; individuals who make final technical recommendations; and individuals whose recommendations are an inherent and recurring part of their positions. See, e.g., Reese/Gilliland, Opinion 05- 005. In considering the above, the necessary conclusion is that, in your former capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 with the Office of Legislative Affairs under job code 08630, you would be considered both an “executive-level State employee” and a “public employee” subject to the Ethics Act. The definition of the term “executive-level State employee” includes “the Governor’s office staff….” 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Since the Office of Legislative Affairs is part of the Office of the Governor, in your former capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 with the Office of Legislative Affairs under job code 08630, you were part of the Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 6 Governor’s office staff. Therefore, in the aforesaid capacity, you were an “executive- level State employee” subject to the Ethics Act. Cf., Maatman, Opinion 96-005. Further, in applying the aforesaid judicially approved objective test in the instant matter, the necessary conclusion is that, in your former capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 with the Office of Legislative Affairs under job code 08630, you would be considered a “public employee” subject to the Ethics Act. Cf., Zamolyi, Advice 06-571; Haviland, Advice 94-607. In your capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 under job code 08630, you had the ability to take or recommend official action of a nonministerial nature with respect to subparagraph (5) within the definition of “public employee” as set forth in the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Specifically, per the job classification specifications under job code 08630, you had the authority to: (1) supervise a staff of technical or clerical employees; (2) prepare and implement recommendations for budget requests/actions and personnel actions; and (3) prepare budget estimates and monitor budget expenditures. The aforesaid duties/authority would be sufficient to establish status as a public employee subject to the Ethics Act. Consequently, upon termination of Commonwealth employment, you became a “former public employee” and a “former executive-level State employee” subject to the restrictions of Section 1103(g) and Section 1103(i) of the Ethics Act. Section 1103(i) restricts former executive-level State employees as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (i)Former executive-level employee.-- No former executive-level State employee may for a period of two years from the time that he terminates employment with this Commonwealth be employed by, receive compensation from, assist or act in a representative capacity for a business or corporation that he actively participated in recruiting to this Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to open a new plant, facility or branch in this Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to expand an existent plant or facility within this Commonwealth, provided that the above prohibition shall be invoked only when the recruitment or inducement is accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth to the business or corporation recruited or induced to expand. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(i). Section 1103(i) restricts the ability of a former executive-level State employee to accept employment or otherwise engage in business relationships following termination of State service, under certain narrow conditions. The restrictions of Section 1103(i) apply even where the business relationship is indirect, such as where the business in question is a client of a new employer, rather than the new employer itself. See, Confidential Opinion, 94-011. However, Section 1103(i) would not restrict you from being employed by, receiving compensation from, assisting, or acting in a representative capacity for a business subject to the conditions that you did not actively participate in recruiting such business to Pennsylvania, and that you did not actively participate in inducing such business to open or expand a plant, facility, or branch in Pennsylvania, through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 7 Unlike Section 1103(i), Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official/public employee from accepting a position of employment. However, it does restrict the former public official/public employee with regard to “representing” a “person” before “the governmental body with which he has been associated”: § 1103. Restricted activities (g)Former official or employee.-- No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added). The terms “represent,” “person,” and "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The term "Person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other businesses. It also includes the former public employee himself, Confidential Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007. The term "represent" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89-005. Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 8 official/public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012. However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95-011. A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for, the new employer. Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the “governmental body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated” is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R. The governmental body with which you are deemed to have been associated upon termination of Commonwealth employment is the Office of the Governor in its entirety, including but not limited to the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. Cf., Mentzer, Advice 01-514; Walsh, Advice 99-610; Baker, Advice 97-520. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your Commonwealth employment, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict “representation” of a “person” before the Office of the Governor, including but not limited to the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. In particular, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would restrict you from performing any job duties for your new employer, Delta, which would involve prohibited representation before the Office of the Governor, including but not limited to the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. Based upon the facts that have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the applicability of Sections 1103(g) and 1103(i) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no use of authority of office or employment, or confidential information received by being in the public position, for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official/public employee and no public official/public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official/public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor’s Code of Conduct. Hendrickson, 11-500 January 6, 2011 Page 9 Conclusion: In the former capacity as an Administrative Officer 1 with the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs under job code 08630, you would be considered a “public employee” and an “executive-level State employee” subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa. Code § 11.1 et seq. Upon termination of your Commonwealth employment, you became a “former public employee” and a “former executive-level State employee” subject to the restrictions of Section 1103(g) and Section 1103(i) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(g), 1103(i). Section 1103(i) would not restrict you from being employed by, receiving compensation from, assisting, or acting in a representative capacity for a business subject to the conditions that you did not actively participate in recruiting such business to Pennsylvania, and that you did not actively participate in inducing such business to open or expand a plant, facility, or branch in Pennsylvania, through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The governmental body with which you are deemed to have been associated upon termination of Commonwealth employment is the Office of the Governor in its entirety, including but not limited to the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. For the first year following termination of your Commonwealth employment, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict “representation” of a “person” before the Office of the Governor, including but not limited to the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. In particular, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would restrict you from performing any job duties for your new employer, Delta Development Group, Inc., which would involve prohibited representation before the Office of the Governor, including but not limited to the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel