HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-622
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
November 1, 2010
Ronald Daniels
Chief Information Officer
Office of Information Technology
Labor and Industry Building
Seventh and Forster Streets
Harrisburg, PA 17120
10-622
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This responds to your letter dated September 22, 2010, by which you requested
an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission.
Issue:
Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65
Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon the Chief
Information Officer for the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (“Department
of Labor and Industry”) with regard to working as a consultant for the Pennsylvania
Center for Health Careers within the Department of Labor and Industry, where such
work would be performed: (1) as supplementary employment to his current position with
the Department of Labor and Industry; (2) while on paid leave from his current position
with the Department of Labor and Industry; or (3) while on temporary leave after
stepping down from his current position with the Department of Labor and Industry.
Facts:
You have requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics
Commission based upon submitted facts, the material portion of which may be fairly
summarized as follows.
You are currently employed as the Chief Information Officer for the Department
of Labor and Industry. You have submitted a copy of your official Commonwealth
position description, which document is incorporated herein by reference. It is noted
that said position description lists your job title as Chief Information Officer 3. A copy of
the job classification specifications for the position of Chief Information Officer 3 (job
code 01553) has been obtained and is also incorporated herein by reference.
The Pennsylvania Center for Health Careers (“CHC”) is established within the
Department of Labor and Industry. You state that the CHC seeks to engage a
consultant (“the Consultant”) for the nine-month period from October 1, 2010, to June
30, 2011. You state that the Consultant would aid a board of healthcare professionals
from across the Commonwealth in addressing the increased need for Information
Technology (“IT”) workers in the healthcare industry in the upcoming year. The tasks
involved would include, inter alia, working with educational institutions to create a
Daniels, 10-622
November 1, 2010
Page 2
curriculum that would address the need for such workers and identifying funding at the
federal level that would assist in the training and education of such workers.
You state that the Consultant would report to David Ranck (“Mr. Ranck”), who is
the interim Executive Director of the CHC. You further state that the Consultant would
report to the Chairman of the Committee on Health IT Careers (“the Committee”) and to
the chair of a subcommittee (“the Subcommittee”) of one of the Commonwealth’s
Workforce Investment Boards (“the Workforce Investment Board”). The submitted facts
do not indicate the nature of the relationship(s), if any, among Mr. Ranck, the
Committee, and/or the Sub-Committee.
You state that in your current position as Chief Information Officer, you report to
the Deputy Chief Information Officer for the Governor’s Office of Administration, and
that you have no direct or indirect connection to the Workforce Investment Board. You
further state that you have not been involved in any discussions about the CHC’s need
for the Consultant and that you do not have any affiliations with the CHC.
You express your view that neither the State Adverse Interest Act nor the
Governor’s Code of Conduct would prohibit you from working as the Consultant for the
CHC.
Based upon the above submitted facts, you seek guidance as to whether the
Ethics Act would permit you to work as the Consultant for the CHC where you would
perform such work: (1) as supplementary employment to your current position with the
Department of Labor and Industry; (2) while on paid leave from your current position
with the Department of Labor and Industry; or (3) while on temporary leave after
stepping down from your current position with the Department of Labor and Industry.
Discussion:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
It is further initially noted that, pursuant to the same aforesaid Sections of the
Ethics Act, an opinion/advice may be given only as to prospective (future) conduct. If
the activity in question has already occurred, the Commission may not issue an
opinion/advice but any person may then submit a signed and sworn complaint, which
will be investigated by the Commission if there are allegations of Ethics Act violations by
a person who is subject to the Ethics Act. To the extent you have inquired as to
conduct that has already occurred, such past conduct may not be addressed in the
context of an advisory opinion. However, to the extent you have inquired as to future
conduct, your inquiry may, and shall, be addressed.
As the Chief Information Officer for the Department of Labor and Industry, you
are a public employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. This conclusion is
based upon the position description and the job classification specifications, which when
reviewed on an objective basis, indicate clearly that the power exists to take or
recommend official action of a non-ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the
following: contracting; procurement; administering or monitoring grants or subsidies;
planning or zoning; inspecting; licensing; regulating; auditing; or other activity(ies) where
the economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person.
Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide:
Daniels, 10-622
November 1, 2010
Page 3
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a)Conflict of interest.--
No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
(j)Voting conflict.--
Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three-member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest."
Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment."
The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
Daniels, 10-622
November 1, 2010
Page 4
"Business."
Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association,
organization, self-employed individual, holding company,
joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity
organized for profit.
"Business with which he is associated."
Any
business in which the person or a member of the person's
immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or
has a financial interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office/employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any
use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others,
and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public official/public employee would
be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the
statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable.
Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have
to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict.
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to contracting, provides as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(f)Contract.--
No public official or public employee or
his spouse or child or any business in which the person or
his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract
valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with
which the public official or public employee is associated or
any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person
who has been awarded a contract with the governmental
body with which the public official or public employee is
associated, unless the contract has been awarded through
an open and public process, including prior public notice and
subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and
contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or
public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall
responsibility for the implementation or administration of the
contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of
this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent
jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the
making of the contract or subcontract.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f).
The term “contract” is defined in the Ethics Act to include an agreement or
arrangement for the acquisition or use by the Commonwealth of consulting services. 65
Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Daniels, 10-622
November 1, 2010
Page 5
Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental
body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official/public
employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is
associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or
subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the
governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an
“open and public process” be observed as to the contract with the governmental body.
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also provides that the public official/public employee
may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or
administration of the contract with the governmental body.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are
advised that any business as to which you are a director, officer, owner, or employee or
in which you have a financial interest would be considered a business with which you
are associated. A sole proprietorship or self-employed individual is included within the
definition of the term “business” as set forth in the Ethics Act. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; In Re:
Nomination Petition of Paulmier, 594 Pa. 433, 937 A.2d 364 (2007).
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act does not prohibit public officials/public
employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public
official/public employee may not use the authority of his public position--or confidential
information obtained by being in that position--for the advancement of his own private
pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion
89-011. Examples of conduct that would be prohibited under Section 1103(a) would
include: (1) the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action,
Metrick, Order 1037; (2) the use of governmental facilities, such as governmental
telephones, postage, equipment, research materials, or other property, or the use of
governmental personnel, to conduct private business activities, Freind, Order 800;
Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the
business with which the public official/public employee is associated in his private
capacity or private client(s). Miller, Opinion 89-024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92-010. A
reasonable and legitimate expectation that a business relationship will form may also
support a finding of a conflict of interest. Amato, Opinion 89-002.
Subject to the statutory exceptions to the definition of “conflict” or “conflict of
interest” as set forth in the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102, pursuant to Section 1103(a)
of the Ethics Act, in your capacity as the Chief Information Officer for the Department of
Labor and Industry you would have a conflict of interest in matters that would financially
impact you, any business(es) with which you are associated, or the customer(s)/client(s)
of any business(es) with which you are associated. See, Kannebecker, supra; Miller,
supra.
In response to your specific question, you are advised as follows.
Subject to the conditions that there would be no use of the authority of your
public position--or confidential information accessed/received by being in your public
position--in furtherance of obtaining work or providing services as the Consultant,
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you in your private capacity from
serving as the Consultant for the CHC where you would perform such work: (1) as
supplementary employment to your current position with the Department of Labor and
Industry; or (2) while on leave from your current position with the Department of Labor
and Industry. However, in your public capacity as the Chief Information Officer for the
Department of Labor and Industry, you would have a conflict of interest in matters that
would financially impact the CHC.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from
participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure
Daniels, 10-622
November 1, 2010
Page 6
requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event
of a voting conflict.
The restrictions and requirements of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have
to be observed whenever applicable.
As for “stepping down” from your current position with the Department of Labor
and Industry, you are advised that if your employment status would change such that
you would be considered a former public employee as to the Governor’s Office of
Administration or the Department of Labor and Industry, then you would be subject to
the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, which provides as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee.--
No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the
governmental body with which he has been associated for
one year after he leaves that body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g).
During the one-year period of applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act,
Section 1103(g) would, inter alia, prohibit you from contracting with your former
governmental body to provide consulting services. Cf., e.g., Shaub, Order 1242;
Confidential Opinion, 97-008; Confidential Opinion, 93-005.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of
the Governor’s Code of Conduct or the State Adverse Interest Act.
Conclusion:
As the Chief Information Officer for the Pennsylvania Department of
Labor and Industry (“Department of Labor and Industry”), you are a public employee
subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65
Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) the Pennsylvania
Center for Health Careers (“CHC”) is established within the Department of Labor and
Industry; (2) the CHC seeks to engage a consultant (“the Consultant”) for the nine-
month period from October 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011; (3) the Consultant would aid a
board of healthcare professionals from across the Commonwealth in addressing the
increased need for Information Technology (“IT”) workers in the healthcare industry in
the upcoming year; (4) the tasks involved would include, inter alia, working with
educational institutions to create a curriculum that would address the need for such
workers and identifying funding at the federal level that would assist in the training and
education of such workers; (5) the Consultant would report to the interim Executive
Director of the CHC, to the Chairman of the Committee on Health IT Careers, and to the
chair of a subcommittee of one of the Commonwealth’s Workforce Investment Boards
(“the Workforce Investment Board”); (6) as Chief Information Officer for the Department
of Labor and Industry, you have no direct or indirect connection to the Workforce
Investment Board; (7) you have not been involved in any discussions about the CHC’s
need for the Consultant; and (8) you do not have any affiliations with the CHC, you are
advised as follows.
Subject to the statutory exceptions to the definition of “conflict” or “conflict of
interest” as set forth in the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102, pursuant to Section 1103(a)
of the Ethics Act, in your capacity as the Chief Information Officer for the Department of
Labor and Industry you would have a conflict of interest in matters that would financially
Daniels, 10-622
November 1, 2010
Page 7
impact you, any business(es) with which you are associated, or the customer(s)/client(s)
of any business(es) with which you are associated.
Subject to the conditions that there would be no use of the authority of your
public position--or confidential information accessed/received by being in your public
position--in furtherance of obtaining work or providing services as the Consultant,
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you in your private capacity from
serving as the Consultant for the CHC where you would perform such work: (1) as
supplementary employment to your current position with the Department of Labor and
Industry; or (2) while on leave from your current position with the Department of Labor
and Industry. However, in your public capacity as the Chief Information Officer for the
Department of Labor and Industry, you would have a conflict of interest in matters that
would financially impact the CHC. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would
be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the
statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable.
Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have
to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. The restrictions and requirements of
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed whenever applicable. As
for “stepping down” from your current position with the Department of Labor and
Industry, you are advised that if your employment status would change such that you
would be considered a former public employee as to the Governor’s Office of
Administration or the Department of Labor and Industry, then you would be subject to
the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. During the one-year period of
applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, Section 1103(g) would, inter alia,
prohibit you from contracting with your former governmental body to provide consulting
services.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such
.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel