Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-578 Confidential ADVICE OF COUNSEL May 10, 2010 10-578 This responds to your faxed letter dated April 9, 2010, by which you requested a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether three As of a [type of municipality] B would be considered “public officials” subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq.; and whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon the aforesaid three B As with regard to participating in discussions and votes onCs or other official matter(s) concerning construction of Ds to the E of an F with which each of the three B As is employed in a private capacity. Facts: You are Solicitor for [name of municipality], hereinafter referred to as “the Municipality.” You have been authorized by [name of individual] (“Individual 1”), [name of individual] (“Individual 2”), and [name of individual] (“Individual 3”), As of the [name of governmental body] (hereinafter referred to as “the Governmental Body”), to request a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission on their behalf. You have submitted facts, the material portion of which may be fairly summarized as follows. The Governmental Body consists of [number] As. You state that the Governmental Body serves as an advisory body to the G of the Municipality and that the Governmental Body has no authority to expend public funds other than reimbursement for personal expenses. You have submitted a copy of Section [cite] of the [title of code] (“the Code”), which sets forth the powers and duties of the Governmental Body as follows: [quote]. The Code, § [cite]. You state that at the present time, a business named [name of business] (“the Business”) is considering the construction of Ds to its E. You state that the proposed construction would take place in the Municipality and that a C for such construction may be presented before the Governmental Body. Confidential Advice, 10-578 May 10, 2010 Page 2 You state that Individual 1 is employed in the H of the Business. Individual 2 is employed in the I of a J of the Business named [name]. Individual 3 is employed in the K of the Business. Based upon the above submitted facts, you ask whether Individual 1, Individual 2, or Individual 3 would have a conflict of interest with regard to participating in discussions and votes on Cs or other official matter(s) concerning the Business. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. In the instant matter, the initial question to be addressed is whether, as As of the Governmental Body, Individual 1, Individual 2, and Individual 3 would be considered “public officials” subject to the Ethics Act. The Ethics Act defines the term “public official” as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Public official.” Any person elected by the public or elected or appointed by a governmental body or an appointed official in the executive, legislative or judicial branch of this Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof, provided that it shall not include members of advisory boards that have no authority to expend public funds other than reimbursement for personal expense or to otherwise exercise the power of the State or any political subdivision thereof. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The related term “governmental body” is defined as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Governmental body." Any department, authority, commission, committee, council, board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, administration, legislative body or other establishment in the executive, legislative or judicial branch of a state, a nation or a political subdivision thereof or any agency performing a governmental function. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The regulations of the State Ethics Commission similarly define the term “public official” and set forth the following additional criteria: (i) The following criteria will be used to determine if the exception in this paragraph is applicable: (A) The body will be deemed to have the power to expend public funds if the body may commit funds or may Confidential Advice, 10-578 May 10, 2010 Page 3 otherwise make payment of moneys, enter into contracts, invest funds held in reserves, make loans or grants, borrow money, issue bonds, employ staff, purchase, lease, acquire or sell real or personal property without the consent or approval of the governing body and the effect of the power to expend public funds has a greater than de minimis economic impact on the interest of a person. (B) The body will be deemed to have the authority to otherwise exercise the power of the Commonwealth or a political subdivision if one of the following exists: (I) The body makes binding decisions or orders adjudicating substantive issues which are appealable to a body or person other than the governing authority. (II) The body exercises a basic power of government and performs essential governmental functions. (III) The governing authority is bound by statute or ordinance to accept and enforce the rulings of the body. (IV) The body may compel the governing authority to act in accordance with the body’s decisions or restrain the governing authority from acting contrary to the body’s decisions. (V) The body makes independent decisions which are effective without approval of the governing authority. (VI) The body may adopt, amend and repeal resolutions, rules, regulations or ordinances. (VII) The body has the power of eminent domain or condemnation. (VIII) The enabling legislation of the body indicates that the body is established for exercising public powers of the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. (ii) The term does not include judges and inspectors of elections, notary publics and political party officers. (iii) The term generally includes persons in the following offices: (A) Incumbents of offices filled by nomination of the Governor and confirmation of the Senate. (B) Heads of executive, legislative and independent agencies, boards and commissions. (C) Members of agencies, boards and commissions appointed by the General Assembly or its officers. (D) Persons appointed to positions designated as officers by the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions. Confidential Advice, 10-578 May 10, 2010 Page 4 (E) Members of municipal, industrial development, housing, parking and similar authorities. (F) Members of zoning hearing boards and similar quasi-judicial bodies. (G) Members of the public bodies meeting the criteria in paragraph (i)(A). 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. In applying the Ethics Act’s definition of the term “public official,” the first portion of the definition provides that a public official is a person who: (1) is elected by the public; (2) is elected or appointed by a governmental body; or (3) is an appointed official in the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of the Commonwealth. Muscalus, Opinion 02-007. When the first portion of the definition is met, status as a public official subject to the Ethics Act is established, unless the exclusion for members of purely advisory boards is applicable. Eiben, Opinion 04-002. In applying the definition of "public official" in the instant matter, the necessary conclusion is that Individual 1, Individual 2, and Individual 3 would fall within the statutory exclusion for members of purely advisory boards lacking authority to expend public funds other than reimbursement for personal expense or to otherwise exercise the power of the State or a political subdivision. This conclusion is based upon a review of Section [cite] of the Code, which clearly indicates that the powers and duties of the Governmental Body as delineated therein are purely advisory. Therefore, based upon the submitted facts, the necessary conclusion is that in their capacities as As of the Governmental Body, Individual 1, Individual 2, and Individual 3 are not “public officials” subject to the Ethics Act. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act only applies to public officials and public employees: § 1103. Restricted activities (a) Conflict of interest.-- No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a). Because, in their capacities as As of the Governmental Body, Individual 1, Individual 2, and Individual 3 are not “public officials” subject to the Ethics Act, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would not apply to restrict them in such capacities. Under the submitted facts, the only provision of the Ethics Act that applies to Individual 1, Individual 2, and Individual 3 is Section 1103(b), which applies to everyone. For your information, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official/public employee anything of monetary value and no public official/public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon an understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official/public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Confidential Advice, 10-578 May 10, 2010 Page 5 In response to your specific question, you are advised that the Ethics Act would not prohibit Individual 1, Individual 2, or Individual 3 from participating in discussions and votes on Cs or other official matter(s) before the Governmental body that would pertain to the Business. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Conclusion: Based upon the submitted facts, you are advised that in their capacities as As of the [name of governmental body] (hereinafter referred to as “the Governmental Body”), a purely advisory board, [name of individual] (“Individual 1”), [name of individual] (“Individual 2”), and [name of individual] (“Individual 3”) are not “public officials” subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Consequently, in their capacities as As of the Governmental Body, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act--which prohibits public officials and public employees from engaging in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest--would not apply to them. Section 1103(b) of the Ethics Act applies to everyone. The Ethics Act would not prohibit Individual 1, Individual 2, or Individual 3 from participating in discussions and votes on Cs or other official matter(s) before the Governmental Body that would pertain to their employer, a business named [name of business]. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel