HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-574 ValenceDuane C. Valence
345 West Main Street
Dalton, PA 18414
Dear Mr. Valence:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
October 15, 2009
09 -574
This responds to your letter dated September 8, 2009, by which you requested
an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any restrictions upon employment of an Adult
Personal Care Homes Licensing Administrator following termination of service with the
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare ( "DPW ").
Facts: You request an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission
regarding the post- employment restrictions of the Ethics Act. You have submitted facts
that may be fairly summarized as follows.
You are currently employed as an Adult Personal Care Homes Licensing
Administrator with the Adult Residential /Personal Care Homes Licensing Office within
DPW. You have submitted a copy of your official DPW position description, which
document is incorporated herein by reference. It is noted that said position description
lists your working title as Adult Residential Regional Licensing Director. A copy of the
job classification specifications for the position of Adult Personal Care Homes Licensing
Administrator (job code 43681) has been obtained and is also incorporated herein by
reference.
You state that you intend to retire from Commonwealth employment in 2010.
You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose any restrictions
upon you with regard to the following post- retirement employment opportunities:
1. Working as a self - employed consultant to currently licensed legal entities
that operate personal care homes or assisted living facilities throughout
Pennsylvania, where in such capacity, you would consult with providers on
matters of regulatory compliance, but you would not represent yourself as
an expert witness in matters where legal entities /providers would be faced
with revocation or non - renewal of licenses issued by DPW for the
operation of personal care homes or assisted living facilities;
Valence, 09 -574
October 15, 2009
Page 2
2. Providing ongoing annual training to ersonal care home /assisted living
facility administrators and /or their staff as an employee of an agency or
corporation or as a self - employed individual;
3. Working as a self - employed consultant to individuals, partnerships or
corporations, prospective providers, or building contractors in
Pennsylvania and other states in matters pertaining to the personal care
home /assisted living field; and
4. Working as a personal care home or assisted living facility administrator
responsible for the day to day operation of such a home or facility.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As an Adult Personal Care Homes Licensing Administrator for DPW, you would
be considered a "public employee" subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the
State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. This
conclusion is based upon the job description and the job classification specifications,
which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicate clearly that the power exists to
take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to one or more
of the following: contracting; procurement; administering or monitoring grants or
subsidies; planning or zoning; inspecting; licensing; regulating; auditing; or other
activity(ies) where the economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of
another person.
Consequently, upon retiring from DPW, you would become a "former public
employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act.
While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official /public employee
from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official /public
employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before the governmental body with
which he has been associated ":
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee. - -No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the
governmental body with which he has been associated for
one year after he leaves that body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the
Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in
any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the
Valence, 09 -574
October 15, 2009
Page 3
following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and
submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or
contain the name of a former public official or public
employee.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership,
committee, club or other organization or group of persons.
"Governmental body with which a public official
or public employee is or has been associated." The
governmental body within State government or a political
subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has
been employed or to which the public official or employee is
or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and
offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa. C. S. § 1102.
The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and
other businesses. It also includes the former public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion, 93 -005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95 -007.
The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of
any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal
appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence;
(3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of
the former public official /public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the
former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying.
Popovich, Opinion 89 -005.
Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a
proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental
body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section
1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public
official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former
governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to
termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However,
if such a pre- existing contract does not involve the unit where the former public
employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine
invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being
submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95 -011.
A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any
documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former ublic
official /public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former
governmental body. The former public official /public employee may also counsel any
person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once
again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former
governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general
informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is
available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly
influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the
representation of, or work for, the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official /public employee with
regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/
public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities.
Valence, 09 -574
October 15, 2009
Page 4
However, the "governmental body with which a public official /public employee is or has
been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other
governmental body where the public official /public employee had influence or control
but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No.
15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R.
The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been
associated upon termination of your employment with DPW would be DPW in its
entirety, including but not limited to the Adult Residential /Personal Care Homes
Licensing Office. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your employment
with DPW, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of
a "person," including a client or employer, before DPW with promised or actual
compensation. See, Shaub, Order 1242.
Turning to your specific inquiry, you are advised that during the first year
following termination of your employment with DPW, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act
would not prohibit you from: (1) working as a self - employed consultant to currently
licensed legal entities that operate personal care homes or assisted living facilities
throughout Pennsylvania; (2) providing ongoing annual training to personal care
home /assisted living facility administrators and /or their staff as an employee of an
agency or corporation or as a self - employed individual; (3) working as a self - employed
consultant to individuals, partnerships or corporations, prospective providers, or building
contractors in Pennsylvania and other states in matters pertaining to the personal care
home /assisted living field; or (4) working as a personal care home or assisted living
facility administrator responsible for the day to day operation of such a home or facility,
subject to the condition that in so doing, you would not engage in prohibited
representation before DPW as delineated above.
Based upon the facts that have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the
applicability of Section 1103(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no
use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a)
of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the
Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official /public
employee and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of
monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment
of the public official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made
to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any
transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question
presented.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code
of Conduct.
Conclusion: As an Adult Personal Care Homes Licensing Administrator for the
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare ( "DPW "), you would be considered a "public
employee" subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act'), 65
Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa.
Code § 11.1 et seq. Upon termination of employment with DPW, you would become a
"former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The former
governmental body would be DPW in its entirety, including but not limited to the Adult
Residential /Personal Care Homes Licensing Office. For the first year following
termination of your employment with DPW, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would
apply and restrict "representation" of a "person," including a client or employer, before
DPW with promised or actual compensation. The restrictions as to representation
outlined above must be followed. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only
been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Valence, 09 -574
October 15, 2009
Page 5
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel