Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-574 TopperCurtis M. Topper Deputy Secretary for Procurement Department of General Services 515 North Office Building Harrisburg, PA 17125 ADVICE OF COUNSEL August 29, 2008 08 -574 Dear Mr. Topper: This responds to your letter of July 30, 2008, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any restrictions upon employment of a Deputy Secretary for Procurement following termination of service with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of General Services ( "DGS "). Facts: You request an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission regarding the post - employment restrictions of the Ethics Act. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. At the time that you submitted your inquiry, you were serving as the Deputy Secretary for Procurement for DGS. In your advisory request, you stated that you would be leaving your position with DGS on August 22, 2008. You stated that on September 2, 2008, you will begin working as Chief Operating Officer at an advertising firm in Harrisburg named the Neiman Group." The Neiman Group currently holds a statewide advertising contract to provide advertising products and services to a number of state agencies. The aforesaid contract is administered by DGS. You express your understanding that pursuant to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, you would be prohibited from personally representing the Neiman Group in its dealings with DGS for a period of one year following termination of your Commonwealth service. Based upon the above submitted facts, you ask whether the Ethics Act would impose any limitations upon you with regard to participating in the Neiman Group's dealings with Commonwealth or state - affiliated agencies other than DGS. Topper, 08 -574 August 29, 2008 Page 2 Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. It is further initially noted that, pursuant to the same aforesaid Sections of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), an opinion /advice may be given only as to prospective (future) conduct. If the activity in question has already occurred, the Commission may not issue an opinion /advice, but any person may then submit a signed and sworn complaint, which will be investigated by the Commission if there are allegations of Ethics Act violations by a person who is subject to the Ethics Act. To the extent that your inquiry relates to conduct that has already occurred, such past conduct may not be addressed in the context of an advisory opinion. However, to the extent your inquiry relates to future conduct, your inquiry may and shall be addressed. As the Deputy Secretary for Procurement with DGS, you would be considered a "public official /public employee" and an "executive -level State employee" subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1; Minnich, Advice 03 -534; Fields, Advice 96 -528. Consequently, upon termination of Commonwealth service, you would become a former public official /public employee and a former executive -level State employee subject to the restrictions of Section 1103(g) and Section 1103(i) of the Ethics Act. Section 1103(i) restricts former executive -level State employees as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (i) Former executive -level employee. - -No former executive -level State employee may for a period of two years from the time that he terminates employment with this Commonwealth be employed by, receive compensation from, assist or act in a representative capacity for a business or corporation that he actively participated in recruiting to this Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to open a new plant, facility or branch in this Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to expand an existent plant or facility within this Commonwealth, provided that the above prohibition shall be invoked only when the recruitment or inducement is accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth to the business or corporation recruited or induced to expand. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(i). Section 1103(i) restricts the ability of a former executive -level State employee to accept employment or otherwise engage in business relationships following termination of State service, under certain narrow conditions. The restrictions of Section 1103(i) apply even where the business relationship is indirect, such as where the business in question is a client of a new employer, rather than the new employer itself. See, Confidential Opinion, 94 -011. However, Section 1103(i) would not restrict you from being employed by, receiving compensation from, assisting, or acting in a representative capacity for a business or corporation subject to the conditions that you did not actively participate in recruiting such business or corporation to Pennsylvania, Topper, 08 -574 August 29, 2008 Page 3 and that you did not actively participate in inducing such business or corporation to open or expand a plant, facility, or branch in Pennsylvania, through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Unlike Section 1103(i), Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official /public employee from accepting a position of employment. However, it does restrict the former public official /public employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before the governmental body with which he has been associated ": § 1103. Restricted activities (g) Former official or employee. - -No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added). The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other businesses. It also includes the former public employee himself, Confidential Opinion, 93 -005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95 -007. The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official /public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89 -005. Topper, 08 -574 August 29, 2008 Page 4 Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However, if such a pre- existing contract does not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95 -011. A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former ublic official /public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former public official /public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official /public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official /public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official /public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official /public employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R. The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been associated upon termination of public service would be DGS in its entirety. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your service with DGS, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of "persons" before DGS. Having set forth the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, you are advised that the Ethics Act would restrict your conduct in your new position with the Neiman Group to the extent that such conduct would constitute prohibited "representation" before DGS. Section 1103(g) would only apply to restrict you from engaging in prohibited "representation" before DGS and would not apply as to other Commonwealth or state - affiliated agencies. However, where such other Commonwealth or state - affiliated agencies would have involvement with DGS, you would have to exercise caution to ensure that you would not engage in prohibited representation before DGS. Based upon the facts that have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the applicability of Sections 1103(g) and 1103(i) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official /public employee and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Topper, 08 -574 August 29, 2008 Page 5 Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct. Conclusion: As the Deputy Secretary for Procurement with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of General Services ( "DGS "), you would be considered a "public official /public employee" and an "executive -level State employee" subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Upon termination of Commonwealth service, you would become a former public official /public employee and a former executive -level State employee subject to the restrictions of Section 1103(g) and Section 1103(i) of the Ethics Act. Under Section 1103(i) of the Ethics Act, you would not be prohibited from being employed by, receiving compensation from, assisting, or acting in a representative capacity for a business or corporation subject to the conditions that you did not actively participate in recruiting such business or corporation to Pennsylvania, and that you did not actively participate in inducing such business or corporation to open or expand a plant, facility, or branch in Pennsylvania through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act as outlined above must be followed. The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been associated upon termination of Commonwealth service would be DGS in its entirety. For the first year following termination of your Commonwealth service, Section 1103) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of "persons" before DGS. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel