HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-558 ConfidentialADVICE OF COUNSEL
May 27, 2008
08 -558
This responds to your letter dated April 9, 2008, received April 17, 2008, by
which you requested confidential advice from the Pennsylvania State Ethics
Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would present any prohibitions or restrictions upon you as a
County A ( "County ") Council Member with regard to participating in matters before
County Council pertaining to a bond issue for a project undertaken by the B Authority,
where a firm for which you are a contracted consultant might bid on the construction
proposal for the project.
Facts: In your capacity as a County Council Member, you request an advisory
from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission based upon submitted facts that may
be fairly summarized as follows.
You first note that a prior confidential advisory, specifically, Confidential Advice,
[number], was issued to you based upon facts set forth in an advisory request letter
dated [date]. It is administratively noted that Confidential Advice, [number] concluded
that you would have a conflict of interest as to the County's approval of financing for a
project where a [type of firm] for which you were a contracted consultant, specifically,
Firm C, intended to bid on the project, and you stood to financially gain if that firm would
be awarded the contract.
You state that the particulars of your current situation are the same as those
addressed in Confidential Advice, [number], except that the current matter before
County Council is a proposed bond issue for a B Authority project (hereinafter, the
Project "). You state, If and when that issue is totally approved, my company may bid on
the construction proposal." April 9, 2008, Advisory Request Letter, paragraph 3
(Emphasis in the original). You have submitted a letter dated March 21, 2008, from
your attorney, in which your attorney has recommended that you abstain from any
County Council votes pertaining to the issue, due to a possible conflict of interest based
upon your relationship with Firm C.
Confidential Advice, 08 -558
May 27, 2008
Page 2
Based upon the above submitted facts, you ask whether you would have a
conflict of interest in matters pertaining to the bond issue for the Project, given that Firm
C might bid on the construction proposal for the Project.
Finally, you note that when the bond issue for the Project was reviously
addressed at a County Council meeting, the matter was not put on the agenda until the
final minutes of the meeting. You state that although you did not have time to present
the County Council secretary with a written notice of your abstention, you publicly
declared that you have a conflict of interest as to such matter. You state that you have
also prepared a written statement to be put in the minutes for the aforesaid meeting.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. In
this regard, this advisory is issued based upon submitted facts indicating that you
continue to work as a contracted consultant with Firm C.
It is further initially noted that, pursuant to the same aforesaid Sections of the
Ethics Act, an opinion /advice may be given only as to prospective (future) conduct. If
the activity in question has already occurred, the Commission may not issue an
opinion /advice but any person may then submit a signed and sworn complaint, which
will be investigated by the Commission if there are allegations of Ethics Act violations by
a person who is subject to the Ethics Act. To the extent you have inquired as to
conduct that has already occurred, such past conduct may not be addressed in the
context of an advisory opinion. However, to the extent you have inquired as to future
conduct, your inquiry may, and shall, be addressed.
As a County Council Member, you are a public official subject to the provisions of
the Ethics Act.
Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
Confidential Advice, 08 -558
May 27, 2008
Page 3
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
"Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association,
organization, self - employed individual, holding company,
joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity
organized for profit.
"Business with which he is associated." Any
business in which the person or a member of the person's
immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or
has a financial interest.
"Financial interest." Any financial interest in a legal
entity engaged in business for profit which comprises more
than 5% of the equity of the business or more than 5% of the
assets of the economic interest in indebtedness.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
Confidential Advice, 08 -558
May 27, 2008
Page 4
of the public official /public employee himself, a member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any
use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others,
and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809.
In each instance of a voting conflict, Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act requires the
public official /public employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and
reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the
person recording the minutes. In the event that the required abstention results in the
inability of the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due
to the abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible
provided the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion
02 -005.
It is noted that Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act pertaining to conflicts of interests
does not prohibit public officials /public employees from having outside business
activities or employment; however, the public official /public employee may not use the
authority of his public position - -or confidential information obtained by loeing in that
position - -for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business
with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. Examples of conduct that would
be prohibited under Section 1103(a) would include: (1) the pursuit of a private business
opportunity in the course of public action, Metrick, Order 1037; (2) the use of
governmental facilities, such as governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment,
research materials, or other property, or the use of governmental personnel, to conduct
private business activities, Freind, Order 800; Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in
an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public
official /public employee is associated in his private capacity or private clients(s). Miller,
Opinion 89 -024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92 -010.
If a business with which the public official /public employee or immediate family
member is associated or a private customer /client would have a matter pending before
the governmental body, the public official /public employee would generally have a
conflict of interest as to such matter. Kannebecker, supra; Miller, supra. A reasonable
and legitimate expectation that a business relationship will form may also support a
finding of a conflict of interest. Amato, Opinion 89 -002. In each instance of a conflict of
interest, the public official /public employee would be required to abstain fully from
participation and in the instance of a voting conflict, to abstain and satisfy the disclosure
requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to your inquiry, you are
advised as follows. Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) you have an ongoing
business relationship with Firm C as a contracted consultant for that firm; (2) County
Council is considering a proposed bond issue for the Project; and (3) if and when the
issue is totally approved, Firm C might bid on the construction proposal for the Project,
you would have a conflict of interest in your capacity as a County Council Member as to
matter(s) pertaining to the proposed bond issue for the Project.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully
from participation. The abstention requirement would extend beyond voting to include
any use of authority of office. In each instance of a voting conflict, you would be
required to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both
orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes.
Act.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Confidential Advice, 08 -558
May 27, 2008
Page 5
Conclusion: As a County Council Member for County A ( "County "), you are a
public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act
( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) you
have an ongoing business relationship with [type of firm] Firm C as a contracted
consultant for that firm; (2) County Council is considering a proposed bond issue for a B
Authority project (hereinafter, the Project "); and (3) if and when the issue is totally
approved, Firm C might bid on the construction proposal for the Project, you would have
a conflict of interest in your capacity as a County Council Member as to matter(s)
pertaining to the proposed bond issue for the Project. In each instance of a conflict of
interest, you would be required to abstain fully from participation. The abstention
requirement would extend beyond voting to include any use of authority of office. In
each instance of a voting conflict, you would be required to abstain and to publicly
disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written
memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes. Lastly, the propriety
of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel