HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-518 LYTLERobert S. Lytle
86 Center Alley
Homer City, PA 15748
Dear Mr. Lytle:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
February 25, 2008
08 -518
This responds to your letter received January 24, 2008, by which you requested
an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon a Surface
Mine Conservation Inspector for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of
Environmental Protection ( "DEP "), as a result of the prospective mining of a property
that is partially owned by his spouse, where such property is located outside of his
inspection district.
Facts: As a Surface Mine Conservation Inspector with DEP, you request an
advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. You have submitted a copy
of your official Commonwealth position description, which is incorporated herein by
reference. A copy of the job classification specifications for your position (job code
71580) has been obtained and is also incorporated herein by reference.
You state that you work out of DEP's Cambria Office in Ebensburg,
Pennsylvania, and that your inspection district is presently located in Somerset County.
As a result of an inheritance, your wife owns twenty -five percent (25 %) of the
surface and minerals of a property (hereinafter, "Property ") consisting of approximately
230 acres located in Toby Township, Clarion County, Pennsylvania. The submitted
facts do not identify the other owners of the Property or their respective ownership
interests.
You state that the other owners of the Property wish to have coal extracted from
the Property by surface mining. The Property is situated in the district assigned to
DEP's Knox Office. You state that there is no way that you could affect either the
permitting or inspection of the Property.
You ask whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions
upon you as a result of the prospective mining of the Property.
Lytle, 08 -518
February 25, 2008
Page 2
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11)
of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As a Surface Mine Conservation Inspector for DEP, you are a public employee
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. This conclusion is based upon the position
description and the job classification specifications, which when reviewed on an
objective basis, indicate clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official
action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the following:
contracting; procurement; administering or monitoring grants or subsidies; planning or
zoning; inspecting; licensing; regulating; auditing; or other activity(ies) where the
economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
"Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother
or sister.
Lytle, 08 -518
February 25, 2008
Page 3
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any
use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others,
and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are
advised that your spouse is a member of your "immediate family" as that term is defined
in the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, in your public capacity as a
Surface Mine Conservation Inspector with DEP, you would generally have a conflict of
interest in matters that would financially impact you, your spouse, or a business with
which you or your spouse is associated. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you
would be required to abstain fully from participation.
Generally, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from using the
authority of your public position, or confidential information accessed or received as a
result of being a Surface Conservation Mine Inspector with DEP, to effectuate a private
pecuniary benefit to your spouse relative to a property in which she has an ownership
interest. Based upon the submitted facts that the Property is located outside of your
inspection district, and that there is no way that you could affect either the permitting or
inspection of the Property, no further analysis of your inquiry is required as to the
Property.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of
Conduct.
Conclusion: As a Surface Mine Conservation Inspector with the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), you are a public
employee subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act
( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Your spouse is a member of your "immediate
family" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the
Ethics Act, in your public capacity as a Surface Mine Conservation Inspector with DEP,
you would generally have a conflict of interest in matters that would financially impact
you, your spouse, or a business with which you or your spouse is associated. In each
instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully from
participation. Generally, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from using
the authority of your public position, or confidential information accessed or received as
a result of being a Surface Conservation Mine Inspector with DEP, to effectuate a
private pecuniary benefit to your spouse relative to a property in which she has an
ownership interest. Based upon the submitted facts that your spouse is part owner of
the surface and minerals of a property ( "Property ") located outside of your inspection
district, and that there is no way that you could affect either the permitting or inspection
of the Property, no further analysis of your inquiry is required as to such Property.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
Lytle, 08 -518
February 25, 2008
Page 4
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel