HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-515 JOSEPHJoseph M. Joseph, Esquire
Douglas & Joseph
409 North Hermitage Road
Hermitage, PA 16148
Dear Mr. Joseph:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
February 12, 2008
08 -515
This responds to your letter received January 10, 2008, by which you requested
an advisory from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would present any prohibitions or restrictions upon a borough
council member, whose son -in -law is employed by the borough as a street department
worker, with regard to voting on issues pertaining to the sale of the borough's water
treatment plant to a private water supplier, where the borough council member's son -in-
law, as the least senior member of the collective bargaining unit that covers the
borough's water treatment plant employees and street department workers, could be
laid off if the borough's water treatment plant would be sold.
Facts: As Solicitor for the Borough of Sharpsville ( "Borough ") in Mercer County,
Pennsylvania, you have been authorized by Robert K. Piccirilli ( "Piccirilli "), a Borough
Council Member, to request an advisory from the State Ethics Commission on his
behalf. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows.
The Borough owns and operates a water treatment plant ( "the Plant ") and a
water distribution system, both of which are located within the Borough boundaries.
The Borough currently employs six full -time hourly employees to operate the Plant and
seven additional hourly employees in the Borough Street Department ( "Street
Department "). You state that the duties of the Plant employees and the Street
Department employees sometimes overlap.
All employees of the Plant and the Street Department are members of the
AFSCME collective bargaining unit ( "the Bargaining Unit'). Piccirilli's son -in -law, who is
employed as an hourly Street Department worker, is the least senior member of the
Bargaining Unit.
The Borough is considering building a new water treatment plant or, in the
alternative, selling the Plant and water distribution system to a private water supplier.
You state that if the Plant would be sold, Piccirilli's son -in -law, as the least senior
Joseph, 08 -515
February 12, 2008
Page 2
member of the Bargaining Unit, could be laid off. You state, however, that pursuant to
the terms of the AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement, Piccirilli's son -in -law would
have the right of recall within three years of being laid off.
You state that the Borough Code requires the Borough to adopt an ordinance if it
is going to sell the Plant and the water distribution system. Borough Council consists of
seven Members.
Based upon the above submitted facts, you ask whether the Ethics Act would
permit Piccirilli to vote as a Borough Council Member on issues pertaining to the sale of
the Plant.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As a Borough Council Member, Piccirilli is a public official subject to the
provisions of the Ethics Act.
Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j).
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
Joseph, 08 -515
February 12, 2008
Page 3
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
"Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother
or sister.
65 Pa. C. S. § 1102.
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any
use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others,
and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809.
In each instance of a voting conflict, Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act requires the
public official /public employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and
reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the
person recording the minutes. In the event that the required abstention results in the
inability of the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due
to the abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible
provided the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion
02 -005.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are
advised as follows.
Subject to the statutory exceptions to the definition of "conflict" or "conflict of
interest," pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, Piccirilli would have a conflict of
interest in matters before Borough Council that would financially impact him, a member
of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated. As noted above, the term "immediate family" is defined to include
a parent, spouse, child, brother or sister. Piccirilli's son -in -law is not a member of his
Joseph, 08 -515
February 12, 2008
Page 4
immediate family. Since Piccirilli's son -in -law is not a member of his immediate family,
Piccirilli would not have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act in
matters before Borough Council that would financially impact his son -in -law but that
would not financially impact Piccirilli, a member of his immediate family, or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
Turning to your specific inquiry, you are advised that absent some basis for a
conflict of interest other than the employment of Piccirilli's son -in -law with the Street
Department, Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit Piccirilli from voting on
issues pertaining to the sale of the Plant.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Borough Code.
Conclusion: As a Council Member for the Borough of Sharpsville ( "Borough ") in
Mercer County, Pennsylvania, Robert K. Piccirilli ( "Piccirilli ") is a public official subject to
the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. §
1101 et seq. Subject to the statutory exceptions to the definition of "conflict" or "conflict
of interest," pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, Piccirilli would have a conflict
of interest in matters before Borough Council that would financially impact him, a
member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. Piccirilli's son -in -law is not a member of his "immediate
family" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. Since Piccirilli's son -in -law is not a
member of his immediate family, Piccirilli would not have a conflict of interest under
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act in matters before Borough Council that would
financially impact his son -in -law but that would not financially impact Piccirilli, a member
of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated. Under the submitted facts that: (1) the Borough is considering
selling the water treatment plant ( "the Plant ") owned by the Borough; (2) all employees
of the Plant and the Borough Street Department ( "Street Department ") are members of
the AFSCME collective bargaining unit ( "Bargaining Unit "); (3) the duties of the Plant
employees and the Street Department employees sometimes overlap; (4) Piccirilli's
son -in -law is employed with the Street Department; and (5) as the least senior member
of the Bargaining Unit, Piccirilli's son -in -law might be laid off if the Plant is sold, you are
advised as follows. Absent some basis for a conflict of interest other than the
employment of Piccirilli's son -in -law with the Street Department, Section 1103(a) of the
Ethics Act would not prohibit Piccirilli from voting on issues pertaining to the sale of the
Plant. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
Joseph, 08 -515
February 12, 2008
Page 5
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel